Non-News in Established Media - "Germany Once Again is Happily Participating in Genocide"

How will future historians once judge Germany? How can they see the madness repeat itself and the public opinion joining in the consent, that the bad they are doing is the 'right thing to do'? How can politicians turn around nonsensical arguments, repeat them continuously, make them the only tolerated opinion via public media and think that makes their nonsense truth?

In my opinion, the judgement of future generations will be devastating, not only over Germany, but especially Germany, because with its history and experiences in the last century, it should have known better.

But happily joining, supporting and encouraging another 'country', if you even can call this conglomerate of Zionists that, in eradicating another ethnicity and extinguishing the native population, in the future will most certainly receive the harsh judgement it deserves.

Causing the death of thousands of children, either by funding or delivering the bombs for the direct bombings, maiming and wounding of children, and intentionally starving the local population by blocking their access to water and food, and declining funding for the only remaining help-organization providing them with food and aid.

Not even the preliminary ruling of the ICJ gave them pause to rethink their position.

This will not strengthen their defense and pretenses of 'being on the right side of history', but rather will condemn them for all eternity.

P.S.: Remember, with an annoying food / sugar-intolerance, my tolerance for political madness is limited - and the previous Christmas-time with all the cookies and sweets did not help to lighten my mood.

So my judgement over the German politicians is as harsh as they deserve. I condemn them and would rather feel it adequate to see them in Den Haag in front of the International Court of Justice for their continuous ignoring and violating human basic rights.

In Memoriam Gonzalo Lira

Perhaps you ask, who Gonzalo Lira is, or rather was.
I won't give details to him or his background, or even my reasons for mentioning him and his passing here.

But today, things just became too much and I finally had to break my long silence here.

I am angry for so many reasons, and starting to write here again might cause me to break my equilibrium and finally explode.

In a way, this post already is that, me exploding - or at least bubbling over.

 

Gonzalo Lira (1968 - 2024, killed in and by UKR)

R.I.P.

Please take a moment and say a prayer with me for Gonzalo Lira and his family (he has two young children) and also for what he fought for - for the freedom of speech.
Is 'freedom of speech' as dead as he is now?

 

(I might not answer comments on this post, though I hesitate to restrict them altogether.)

What to Do in Case of Armageddon ...

The Bible clearly tells us what to do in case we learn that there is to be the end of the world tomorrow.

It is one of my favorite quotes from the Bible, which explains so much about the world, but also about our fears and how humankind should behave, compared to what it actually does.

"When tomorrow there is to be the end of the world, plant a tree today."

That certainly would help, if each and every one would do that.
Perhaps even on an annual basis, like China, who had achieved the sole effort ever that so far was able to push back the expansion of the desert.

But what do we do instead?

We reduce the availability of energy and heating in a way, that the population gets so desperate, that even the last trees are burned down, instead of thinking or having the resources left to planting new ones.

Way to go to save the world, humankind ...

 

Gluing yourself uselessly somewhere to hinder others to obtain their livelyhood - especially with toxic and environmentally dangerous instant glues - is far from overwhelming me as a constructive option to really do something helpful for our environment. It just shows the madness of brainwashed people, who have no real respect and regard for the value of life, especially if it is not only their own, but that of their neighbors.

Their efforts only leave desperately poor people far and wide. Which for them conveniently fulfills their hidden goal, to forcibly reduce the human population by letting them starve to death - obviously only the others, never themselves!

 

The Third Gender

 You will be surprised, why 'the Third Gender' is of interest to someone not being able to eat sugar.

But things quite honestly annoy me, especially when they are handled with stupidity.

And this question about the 'Third Gender', especially here in Germany, is handled with more stupidity than one would expect.

For example, that the naming 'the third gender' is just unreflectedly translated into German with 'das dritte Geschlecht' and used as a political slogan to force people to 'gender', is so out of place that you would expect people - especially the ones meant by this supposed 'more tolerance'-campaign - would protest by now. (But so far, I can't see any protests far and wide.)

German as a language per se has three genders - male, felmale and the third for things.

So if you say 'third gender' in Germany would automatically mean 'things'. So to propose that people in Germany declare themselves of belonging to the 'third gender' should raise astonishment.

Now, what could they have done? Declared themselves the fourth gender?

Of course they did not want that, as that would suggest, that they are beneath the previous three and only take fourth place (which by the way once again suggests what women always critizise - females come behind men and so are only regarded as second best. Though I want to add, that in history and especially in addresses in Germany, the female has the higher social status and comes before a man. Just our modern times forgot that appreciation of the female ability to procreate and guaranty the continued existence of our genes, which was the more valued position that needed and had a right to be protected.)

So, no fourth place for the 'new' gender.

But the greatest irony of it all is, that the short version for the 'new' third gender is 'D', once again an unreflected taking over of the English word 'diverse', which conveniently exists in Germany as well as 'divers'.

But D also is the initial for 'Ding', the German word for 'thing', which now completes the irony with the 'third gender'.

So, who in Germany willingly declares him-/her-/itself to belong to the 'third gender', if he is not a jokester? (Or should I have said jokester:innen?)

As a result, I don't trust any statistics the researchers come up with, as I doupt the right mind of people declaring themselves of belonging to any of those new categories or 'creations' of supposed 'inclusion', while separating so far included varieties of one sole thing, a human heart.

By the way, in my opinion a bit of tolerance towards our neighbors would come a long way in making stupid groupings and naming-exclusions unnecessary, as one would recognise how colorful the world really is and appreciate it in all its bandwidth.

P.S.: As usual, just my personal opinion. If you don't agree, I did not force you to read it. So go and vent somewhere else.

History & Medicine

In historic comparative studies, the sole main element that enhanced the lifespan of the population in the last century was ... (I will reveal it. Just stay for a moment longer.)

You will assume, the medical improvements, all the advanced medicine, better food, refrigerators, ...

NO!

It was the invention of the central heating and warmer room temperatures on average, to result in a significant increase in the lifespan of the population.

The medicine was confronted with illnesses and treatments for an aging population, that formerly had not been necessary, as the people would have already died by then. That increased the necessity for medicine and treatments, but they did not lead to this development, but rather are the result of it and might contribute to a much slighter extent to this development.

Therefore, the current demand for lower heating in the coming winter months could also be declared as an intentional reduction of the population.

Does anyone openly state that fact?

No, not to my knowledge.

Disclaimer:

Without sugar in my life, my patience for stupidity is rather limited. So do not wonder, when I state my dissatisfaction with nonsense quite openly here.

Cold Temperatures Especially Hinder Women

Just a note to remember ...

In the last few years, researchers proved, that women show better academic results, when the room temperatures are warmer, while the normal office temperatures of 17 - 19 degrees are too cold for women to show their optimal worth, but in contrast are ideal for men.

So, when we know, women will suffer most of a cold winter, to freeze is now declared 'patriotic' and a 'national duty'.

How very 'patriotic', to hinder women most of all ...

In Our Times More Than Ever ...

 "Destruction is the weapon of stupidity."

"Zerstörung ist die Waffe der Dummheit."

(RG 23.05.2021)