How will future historians once judge Germany? How can they see the madness repeat itself and the public opinion joining in the consent, that the bad they are doing is the 'right thing to do'? How can politicians turn around nonsensical arguments, repeat them continuously, make them the only tolerated opinion via public media and think that makes their nonsense truth?
In my opinion, the judgement of future generations will be devastating, not only over Germany, but especially Germany, because with its history and experiences in the last century, it should have known better.
But happily joining, supporting and encouraging another 'country', if you even can call this conglomerate of Zionists that, in eradicating another ethnicity and extinguishing the native population, in the future will most certainly receive the harsh judgement it deserves.
Causing the death of thousands of children, either by funding or delivering the bombs for the direct bombings, maiming and wounding of children, and intentionally starving the local population by blocking their access to water and food, and declining funding for the only remaining help-organization providing them with food and aid.
Not even the preliminary ruling of the ICJ gave them pause to rethink their position.
This will not strengthen their defense and pretenses of 'being on the right side of history', but rather will condemn them for all eternity.
P.S.: Remember, with an annoying food / sugar-intolerance, my tolerance for political madness is limited - and the previous Christmas-time with all the cookies and sweets did not help to lighten my mood.
So my judgement over the German politicians is as harsh as they deserve. I condemn them and would rather feel it adequate to see them in Den Haag in front of the International Court of Justice for their continuous ignoring and violating human basic rights.
